Algebraic Foundations of Proof Refinement

نویسندگان

  • Jonathan Sterling
  • Robert Harper
چکیده

We contribute a general apparatus for dependenttactic-based proof refinement in the LCF tradition, in which thestatements of subgoals may express a dependency on the proofs ofother subgoals; this form of dependency is extremely useful andcan serve as an algorithmic alternative to extensions of LCF basedon non-local instantiation of schematic variables. Additionally,we introduce a novel behavioral distinction between refinementrules and tactics based on naturality. Our framework, calledDependent LCF, is already deployed in the nascent RedPRLproof assistant for computational cubical type theory.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Algebraic Frameworks for Probabilistic and Concurrent Systems

Formal methods have been extensively used and studied in the area of theoretical computer science ultimately with the aim of providing the technical foundations to justify design methods for producing high quality software systems. Formal methods provide a way to write specifications of required behaviour together with rules to check that the implementation’s behaviour is consistent with that o...

متن کامل

Grant Agreement: 644047 INtegrated TOol chain for model-based design of CPSs Foundations of the SysML profile for CPS modelling

Deliverable 2.2a report on work carried out in Task 2.1 in Year 2 of the INTOCPS project. The objective in this is to give semantics to SysML to enable it to be used as the entry-level modelling notation for the INTO-CPS tool chain. This entails extracting structural information from SysML models and carrying out some healthiness checks. We report on our approach to verify the healthiness and w...

متن کامل

Algebraic Composition and Refinement of Proofs

We present an algebraic calculus for proof composition and refinement. Fundamentally, proofs are expressed at successive levels of abstraction, with the perhaps unconventional principle that a formula is considered to be its own most abstract proof, which may be refined into increasingly concrete proofs. Consequently, we suggest a new paradigm for expressing proofs, which views theorems and pro...

متن کامل

ALGEBRAIC INDEPENDENCE OF CERTAIN FORMAL POWER SERIES (I)

We give a proof of the generalisation of Mendes-France and Van der Poorten's recent result over an arbitrary field of positive characteristic and then by extending a result of Carlitz, we shall introduce a class of algebraically independent series.

متن کامل

A Modern Proof of Chevalley’s Theorem on Algebraic Groups

Let k be a field, and let G be an algebraic group over k, by which we mean a connected smooth k-group scheme (not necessarily affine). Recall that such a G is automatically separated, finite type, and geometrically integral over k [4, Exp VIA, 0.3, 2.1.2, 2.4]. The most important classes of algebraic groups are the affine algebraic groups (also called linear algebraic groups, since affine algeb...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره abs/1703.05215  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017